| 1. | The first part is about the connotation of " amicus curiae " briefs and its history “法庭之友”陈述的问题不能被无限期的搁置,最终必须在制度层面加以解决。 |
| 2. | Such a response to the issue of amicus curiae in an impromptu and inconsistent manners by the dispute settlement body have triggered the hot debate among the wto members 争端解决机构对法庭之友意见采取一案一议、非一连贯性的做法,引发了成员国之间激烈的争论。 |
| 3. | The issue of " amicus curiae " briefs has experienced a process , which is from denial to shake , then to acceptance , in the wto dispute settlement body 由于“法庭之友”及其陈述的法律地位不明确, wto争端解决机构,尤其是上诉机构对待“法庭之友”陈述的实践就成为值得研究的问题。 |
| 4. | America is also an advocator of regulation of amicus curiae in which non - behalf relevant members of trade disputes nominate . panelists and members of appellate bodies 此外,美国也提倡“法官的顾问制度” ,即由贸易争端的非相关利益成员方提名争端解决程序中专家组成员或上诉机构成员的制度。 |
| 5. | The contribution of ec focuses on panel establishment , implementation of recommendations and rulings , compensation and the suspension of concessions , regulation of amicus curiae and so on 欧共体把谈判的重点放在了专家组的组成、建议与裁决的执行、补偿与中止减让、法庭之友制度等方面。 |
| 6. | After the establishment of the world trade organization , some non - governmental organizations joined into the wto dispute settlement by submitting “ amicus curiae " briefs to wto dispute settlement agency “法庭之友”及其陈述的出现给一直饱受缺乏透明度非议的wto争端解决机制带来了新鲜空气。 |
| 7. | " amicus curiae " briefs was briefly applied in the litigation system of common law countries such as britain and the united states . at present , there are fewer presentations on this issue in china Wto争端解决机制当中并没有关于“法庭之友”及其陈述的规定,但“法庭之友”及其陈述却在wto争端解决的实践当中频频出现。 |
| 8. | With these questions , the article mainly discusses the theoretical basis and realistic meaning of expert legal opinion , and puts forward the suggestions to consummate it in comparing it with the amicus curiae system of the usa 带着这些问题,本文重点探讨了专家法律意见书的理论基础和现实意义,并在和美国法院之友制度的比较评析中提出了完善我国专家法律意见书的建议。 |
| 9. | If it was necessary to instruct such a counsel in a case , having regard to the particular circumstances of the case , the instruction to the counsel would make it clear that his role in the review committee hearing is essentially that of an amicus curiae 假如在考虑案件的特定情况后,某宗案件必须委派该大律师,署方会清楚指示该大律师其在覆核委员会聆讯中的角色本质上乃法庭之友。 |
| 10. | If it was necessary to instruct such a counsel in a case , having regard to the particular circumstances of the case , the instruction to the counsel would make it clear that his role in the review committee hearing is essentially that of an amicus curiae 假如在考虑案件的特定情况后,某宗案件必须委派该大律师,署方会清楚指示该大律师其在覆核委员会聆讯中的角色本质上乃法庭之友。 |